KEYWORDS: Optical lithography, Metals, Etching, Transistors, Atomic layer deposition, Silica, Inspection, Electrodes, Transmission electron microscopy, System on a chip
The surrounding-gate-transistor (SGT) is a vertical gate-all-around device with a new design to exploit natural area gain for further scaling the SRAM size beyond N5 node. One of the benefits in SGT is it can fully decouple the dependency of the gate length (Lg) and the source/drain (S/D) contact size from the contact gate pitch (CGP) scaling, which is seen as a hard limit for the conventional scaling. To fully realize the benefit of area gain and Lg scaling independent from lithography, the patterning challenges of 3D vertical device structure must be resolved. In this paper, we report the MOL patterning challenges in SGT device fabrication, such as Metal recess process, Bottom Contact formation (VBG), Cross point formation (XC), Top electrode (TE) patterning.
As conventional pitch scaling is saturating, scaling boosters such as buried power rail (BPR) [1-4] and its extension to backside power delivery (BSPDN) [5, 6] could provide 20% and 30% area gain [7], respectively. BPR can also help to improve SRAM design [8] and is a building block in novel architectures such as CFET [9, 10], for technology scaling beyond the 3 nm CMOS node. The two main features of BPR technology include: (i) the introduction of BPR metal within the fin module (fig. 1). Metal insertion in front-end-ofline (FEOL) has a risk of tool/wafer cross-contamination. Ensuring that BPR metal is fully encapsulated during contamination critical processes such as epitaxy, is therefore, essential. A proper choice of metal limits the risk of device performance/reliability degradation from metal diffusion & mechanical stress. (ii) The addition of VBPR via connections from M0A contact level to the BPR lines. Its challenges include high aspect ratio (AR) patterning, achieving low resistance (R) and reliable contact with BPR. This paper reports an overview of BPR/Via-to-BPR (VBPR) module development and metallization options at BPR and VBPR.
The semiconductor scaling roadmap shows the continuous node to node scaling to push Moore’s law down to the next generations. In that context, the foundry N5 node requires 32nm metal pitch interconnects for the advanced logic Back- End of Line (BEoL). 193immersion usage now requires self-aligned and/or multiple patterning technique combinations to enable such critical dimension. On the other hand, EUV insertion investigation shows that 32nm metal pitch is still a challenge but, related to process flow complexity, presents some clear motivations.
Imec has already evaluated on test chip vehicles with different patterning approaches: 193i SAQP (Self-Aligned Quadruple Patterning), LE3 (triple patterning Litho Etch), tone inversion, EUV SE (Single Exposure) with SMO (Source-mask optimization). Following the run path in the technology development for EUV insertion, imec N7 platform (iN7, corresponding node to the foundry N5) is developed for those BEoL layers.
In this paper, following technical motivation and development learning, a comparison between the iArF SAQP/EUV block hybrid integration scheme and a single patterning EUV flow is proposed. These two integration patterning options will be finally compared from current morphological and electrical criteria.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on
SPIE.org.
INSTITUTIONAL Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.
PERSONAL Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.