Error reduction and modeling for hexapod positioners of secondary mirrors for large ground-based telescopes

Ryan C. Sneed; Paul J. Keas

doi:10.1117/12.2056644

4 August 2014 Error reduction and modeling for hexapod positioners of secondary mirrors for large ground-based telescopes

Ryan C. Sneed, Paul J. Keas

Author Affiliations +

Proceedings Volume 9150, Modeling, Systems Engineering, and Project Management for Astronomy VI; 915020 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2056644
Event: SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation, 2014, Montréal, Quebec, Canada

Abstract

The positioning requirements for secondary mirrors and instruments for large ground-based telescopes are becoming increasingly challenging. Modern telescope designs, such as LSST and TMT, are specifying repeatability and/or absolute accuracy limits below 10 μm and 10 μrad for the hexapod positioning systems generally used for these applications. Hexapod error sources, including lead screw pitch variations, windup, backlash, friction, thermal expansion, compliance, sensing, and joint node location uncertainties, are examined along with methods for reducing or eliminating these errors by mechanical means or through calibration. Alternative sensing approaches are discussed and their relative benefits are evaluated. Finally, a model-based design approach is presented for conducting initial design trade studies, assessing technical risk, predicting achievable performance, establishing subsystem and component requirements, and tracking positioning error budgets through the entire development process. A parametric actuator model and its initial results are described, and testing approaches are outlined to identify key model parameters and verify subsystem and component performance.

Citation Download Citation

Ryan C. Sneed and Paul J. Keas "Error reduction and modeling for hexapod positioners of secondary mirrors for large ground-based telescopes", Proc. SPIE 9150, Modeling, Systems Engineering, and Project Management for Astronomy VI, 915020 (4 August 2014); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2056644

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

;

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE