Paper
30 July 2002 Hopkins versus Abbe': a lithography simulation matching study
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
We have developed an ultrafast lithographic 2D aerial image simulator named LithoCruiserTM. It employs a novel algorithm based on Hopkins imaging (Titanium model). Compared to currently available simulation tools, LithoCruiser has demonstrated an order of magnitude increase in computational speed. This makes it well suited for predicting the printing of sizeable 2D patterns as well as the analysis of overlapping process windows for multiple feature cut-lines. With such a high computational speed, there is a need to determine whether its accuracy has been compromised. A comprehensive set of comparisons was performed against an internal standard based on Abbe imaging (Platinum model) - one that is comparable to commercially available simulators. Analyses of CD through pitch for three 1D mask types (binary chrome, dark field, and PSM) as a function of NA, illumination, and aberrations were conducted. LithoCruiser predicted trends through pitch that agreed well with both internal standard and commercially available lithography simulators. Largest deviations were no more than 5 to 10 nm with typical values of 3 to 5 nm. As the LithoCruiser accuracy setting was increased, CD values converged to target values. The accuracy of CD values was essentially independent of simulation grid setting when less than or equal to 10 nm.
© (2002) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Ralph E. Schlief, Armin Liebchen, and J. Fung Chen "Hopkins versus Abbe': a lithography simulation matching study", Proc. SPIE 4691, Optical Microlithography XV, (30 July 2002); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.474491
Lens.org Logo
CITATIONS
Cited by 4 scholarly publications.
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Titanium

Platinum

Photomasks

Reticles

Computer simulations

Lithography

Error analysis

Back to Top