Challenge of 1-Gb DRAM development when using optical lithography

Timothy R. Farrell; Ronald Nunes; Donald J. Samuels; Alan C. Thomas; Richard A. Ferguson; Antoinette F. Molless; Alfred K. K. Wong; Will Conley; Donald C. Wheeler; Santo Credendino; Munir Naeem; Peter Hoh; Zhijian G. Lu

doi:10.1117/12.275974

7 July 1997 Challenge of 1-Gb DRAM development when using optical lithography

Timothy R. Farrell, Ronald Nunes, Donald J. Samuels, Alan C. Thomas, Richard A. Ferguson, Antoinette F. Molless, Alfred K. K. Wong, Will Conley, Donald C. Wheeler, Santo Credendino, Munir Naeem, Peter Hoh, Zhijian G. Lu

Author Affiliations +

Proceedings Volume 3051, Optical Microlithography X; (1997) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.275974
Event: Microlithography '97, 1997, Santa Clara, CA, United States

Abstract

The traditional lithographic approach employed by the semiconductor industry has been to pursue use of advanced prototype optical exposure tools and resists. The benefits of doing so have been: (1) The lithographic process that is used in development more closely resembles the process that will in fact be used to manufacture the chip. (2) The cost of low K₁ imaging (phase-masks, off-axis illumination, and surface imaging resist) can be avoided. However with the introduction of 1Gb-dynamic random access memory (DRAM) development, a paradigm shift is being experienced within the optical lithographic community. With 1Gb-DRAMs, the minimum feature size falls irreversibly below the optical wavelength used to image the feature. Such a situation will make low K₁ factor imaging unavoidable. With 175 nm groundrules typical for first generation 1G-DRAMs, K₁ factors near 0.4 will be common with 0.5 as an upper limit on advanced systems currently in development irrespective of optical wavelength. This paper will cover the selection process, experimental data, and problems encountered in defining and integrating the lithographic process used to support the critical mask levels on 1Gb-DRAM development. Factors considered include: resist, masks, and illuminations via both simulation and experiment. The simulations were conducted with both internal and externally developed software. The experimental data to be reviewed was generated using an experimental 0.6 NA KrF step and scan system provided by Nikon. The resist used is commercially available from the Shipley corporation.

Citation Download Citation

Timothy R. Farrell, Ronald Nunes, Donald J. Samuels, Alan C. Thomas, Richard A. Ferguson, Antoinette F. Molless, Alfred K. K. Wong, Will Conley, Donald C. Wheeler, Santo Credendino, Munir Naeem, Peter Hoh, and Zhijian G. Lu "Challenge of 1-Gb DRAM development when using optical lithography", Proc. SPIE 3051, Optical Microlithography X, (7 July 1997); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.275974

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available