PERSONAL Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.
Sample handling is an important consideration when aiming for replicating in vivo conditions ex vivo for the sake of validating imaging protocols and identifying biomarkers of disease. We tested five different handling methods: snap frozen in isopentane, directly frozen at -80°C, slowly frozen in a cryobox with and without cryopreservation media, and formalin fixed. The samples were imaged using optical coherence tomography (OCT) for qualitative and quantitative validation based on morphological features and optical properties. All handling methods were compared to fresh tissue samples using OCT-derived optical properties and morphological features. The results indicate a significant difference in the optical attenuation coefficient as well as morphological differences between the five different methods and support the hypothesis that proper sample handling is crucial for obtaining translatable results.
Conference Presentation
(2024) Published by SPIE. Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
PERSONAL Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.
The alert did not successfully save. Please try again later.
Freja Høier, Gavrielle R. Untracht, Amanda Øster Andersen, Karina Stræde, Andreas Kjær, Peter E. Andersen, "Comparison of soft tissue handling protocols for identifying optical properties and morphology," Proc. SPIE 13006, Biomedical Spectroscopy, Microscopy, and Imaging III, 130060K (20 June 2024); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3017638