Open Access Paper
28 December 2022 Classification method for safety status of industrial enterprise based on BP neural network
Yujie Ren, Xunxian Shi, Xingqiang Tian, Shengxiang Ma, Bing Chen
Author Affiliations +
Proceedings Volume 12506, Third International Conference on Computer Science and Communication Technology (ICCSCT 2022); 125065Y (2022) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2662021
Event: International Conference on Computer Science and Communication Technology (ICCSCT 2022), 2022, Beijing, China
Abstract
For the purpose of exploring the classification method for safety status of industrial enterprise, a safety index system was constructed and a model based on back propagation (BP) neural network was also built and applied. The safety index system includes 5 factors and 20 properties. Industrial enterprise can be classified into 4 levels: D, C, B and A, where A is the highest level. 14 training samples and 6 test samples was chosen to train and test the BP neural network until the results achieved the high accuracy, and then the model was used in practical application. The results show that the safety index system is comprehensive and scientific, and the model based on BP neural network is effective enough to reasonably classify safety status of industrial enterprise. This method can be helpful for safety management of government and enterprises themselves.

1.

INTRODUCTION

With the rapid development of industrialisation, safety has been an important issue not only because of an increase in public awareness but also due to the higher standard of occupational health and safety. The dangers in industrial processes and the weakness in safety management can cause incident which brings loss of lives and properties. Avoiding this serious threat for economic development has been a target for government and industrial enterprises1. Thanks to the recent development of safety science and technology, several studies on safety in industry are carried out by government, enterprises and academic organizations2. An amount of safety techniques, such as regulation research, Work Safety Standardisation, Occupational Health and Safety Management System certification and Safety Culture Construction, are widely adopted in different areas. It is meaningful for enterprise to discover the weakness of safety status and refine improvements. It also provides recommendations for government supervision focusing on different enterprises which are evaluated and ranked.

Due to the diversity of safety elements in the industry, it is difficult to cover all of them. Several important aspects are taken into consideration which form an index system in this paper, based on that evaluation and classification can be undertaken. The BP neural network is selected in building evaluation and classification model, which is mature enough to be applied. The input signal transmits forward in this multi-layer feedforward neural network, and information is processing layer by layer until the output. When it cannot achieve the expected output, the error is propagated back to adjust the weights and thresholds, and make the result constantly approach the expected output3-4.

2.

SAFETY INDEX SYSTEM

After analysing the factors that are considered in relevant research in several areas5-12, a safety index system is constructed which contains 5 factors: Safety Management, Safety Condition, Incident Emergency, Safety Indicator and Safety Advance. 20 properties are considered to support the factors. The safety index system is shown in Table 1, where Fi refers to the factor, Pj refers to the property.

Table 1.

Safety index system of industrial enterprise.

FactorsPropertiesRemarks
F1 Safety ManagementP1 Safety OrganisationSafety management leadership, management organisation and staff
P2 Safety ResponsibilityResponsibility and task
P3 Safety RuleRegulation, regime and operating instruction
P4 Safety CulturePropaganda, education and training
P5 Dual PreventionRisk control and accident potential rectification
P6 Project ManagementEngineering construction management, safety facility management, contractor management
P7 Resource SupportHuman resource, funding, technology, equipment and material
P8 Safety TechniqueWork Safety Standardisation, Occupational Health and Safety Management System certification, Safety Culture, safety informatisation and safety conference
P9 Safety InspectionSupervision and examination
F2 Safety ConditionP10 FacilityDistribution, construction, equipment and facilities, fire fighting facilities, special equipment
P11 OperationProcess, personal protection, production work, maintenance work, dangerous work
P12 CircumstanceOuter and inner circumstance, emergency lighting, exit, platform, stair, warning sign
P13 MaterialRaw material, auxiliary material, product
F3 Incident EmergencyP14 Incident ManagementInvestigation and treatment
P15 Emergency PreparednessEmergency organisation and personnel, emergency response plan, emergency supply and equipment, emergency exercise
P16 Emergency TreatmentReport, rescue and treatment
F4 Safety IndicatorP17 Absolute IndicatorNumber of incidents, fatal accidents, deaths, injury, working hour loss, economic loss
P18 Relative IndicatorRate of incident, death, injury, working hours loss, economic loss
 P19 Reward and Punishment 
F5 Safety AdvanceP20 ImprovementReinforcement and promotion

3.

CLASSIFICATION MODEL

3.1

Classification

Based on the safety index system, the safety status of industrial enterprise can be classified into 4 levels: D, C, B and A, where A is the highest level.

3.2

Data collection

Considering enterprises on different levels, 20 samples are selected as training and test samples. Expert scoring method is used to score on 20 properties for each sample. The flow chart of expert scoring is expressed in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Procedures of expert scoring.

00202_PSISDG12506_125065Y_page_3_1.jpg

Five experienced experts from government, enterprises and institution are invited and score following the scoring rules shown in Table 2. A final classification conclusion is also drawn for each sample. 20 sets of data are recorded. The number of the samples on D, C, B and A level are respectively 2, 3, 3 and 2.

Table 2.

The scoring rules for expert scoring.

1234
Poor, weakFair, passGood, meritExcellent, distinction

3.3

BP neural network design

A BP neural network which structure contains three-layer: input-layer, hidden-layer and output-layer, is suitable enough for model building and data computation in this paper. According to the number of properties and classification levels, the number of nodes in input-layer is 20, and the number of nodes in output-layer is 4. The number of nodes in hidden-layer is intended to be 11 by calculation based on the empirical equation below.

00202_PSISDG12506_125065Y_page_3_2.jpg

where n, m and s are respectively the number of nodes in input-layer, output-layer and hidden-layer.

Thus, a BP neural network is designed which structure is “20-11-4”. The topological graph is drawn in Figure 2. where xi refers to input data, yi refers to output data. INi HNi and ONi respectively refers to node in input-layer, hidden-layer and output-layer.

Figure 2.

Topological graph of the BP neural network.

00202_PSISDG12506_125065Y_page_4_1.jpg

3.4

Network building, training and test

Input data are 20 sets of numbers range from 0 to 4. Output data are 20 sets of classification results, which are all transformed to [1 0 0 0], [0 1 0 0], [0 0 1 0] and [0 0 0 1] that separately refer to the level of D, C, B and A. The number of input data and output data are separated as shown in Table 3.

Table 3.

Training and test data separation.

 DCBA
Outputs[1 0 0 0][0 1 0 0][0 0 1 0][0 0 0 1]
Training Data1221
Test Data1111

Several codes are written to build a BP neural network in MATLAB®. The maximum number of training times is set to 1000, the training error is set to 0.0001, the learning rate is set to 0.01. Training data are input in the network, then the program is run until it reaches the set parameters. Subsequently, this network is tested by inputting the test data. In order to make a comparison between test results and expected outputs, a plot is drawn as shown in Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Comparison between test results and expected output.

00202_PSISDG12506_125065Y_page_4_2.jpg

The round symbols refer to the test results and the star symbols refer to the expected outputs. Abscissa refers to the number of test samples, and the ordinate refers to level of safety status D (1), C (2), B (3) and A (4). From the plot, it can be seen that the round symbols exactly coincide the star symbols, which means that test results give a good fit to expected outputs and the accuracy rate is nearly 100%. Therefore, it is proved that this BP neural network is accurate enough to be applied for classification of safety status in industry.

4.

APPLICATION

This method is applied to help the local government to evaluate and classify safety status of enterprises. Two of them, H and J, are chosen to be classified using the classification model based on BP neural network which is well trained and tested.

Five experienced experts from government, enterprises and institution are invited and score following the scoring rules in the same way. The average of five scores is considered as the final score for each property. All of the scores are shown in Table 4 below.

Table 4.

Input data of application samples.

FactorsPropertiesEnterprise HEnterprise J
F1P12.43.6
P22.23.2
P31.02.8
P42.23.4
P51.83.2
P62.23.2
P72.03.2
P81.43.3
P92.03.2
F2P102.22.8
P112.03.2
P122.42.8
P132.03.0
F3P141.82.6
P152.63.4
P162.03.2
F4P172.42.6
P182.62.6
P192.23.2
F5P202.03.0

After inputting the data and running the model program, the results show [0.375 1.0529 -0.1871 -0.0243] and [0.1469 0.23345 -0.0566 0.7581]. The values most approaching to 1 in two samples appear in the second and forth position, thus they can be approximately called [0 1 0 0] and [0 0 0 1]. That means enterprise H is on C level and enterprise J is on A level. This results well satisfy the expectation of experts. A decision is finally made by the local government that safety inspection will be undertaken once a month for enterprise H and twice a year for enterprise J.

5.

CONCLUSIONS

The scope of this research is to explore a scientific classification method for safety status of industrial enterprise. A safety index system contains numerous properties is constructed and makes a contribution for model building. Enterprises can be classified into 4 levels by using the classification model based on BP neural network. It is proved that this model can be accurately applied in industry. This classification method will be helpful for safety management of government and enterprises themselves.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Sincere thanks are expressed to China Academy of Safety Science and Technology for providing support by Basic Research Fund of China Academy of Safety Science and Technology (Grant No. 2022JBKY10).

REFERENCES

[1] 

Zhao, J. H., “Preview on the assessment of safety quantity standardizing of industry and commerce trade enterprise,” J. Safe. Sci.and Technol, 7 212 –5 (2011). Google Scholar

[2] 

Wu, A. X. and Ruan, R. L., J. Xianning U, 31 86 –9 (2011). Google Scholar

[3] 

Gao, D. Q., “On structures of supervised linear basis function feedforward three-layered neural networks,” Ch. J. Comput, 21 80 –6 (1998). Google Scholar

[4] 

Liu, H. T., Han, W. H. and Jia, Y., “Construction of network security indication-system based on back propagation neural network,” Net. Infor. Secur, 4 26 –9 (2018). Google Scholar

[5] 

Wen, C., Zhang, L., Meng, B. and Zuo, Q., Henan Sci, 38 1660 –8 (2020). Google Scholar

[6] 

Deng, B. and Song, R., Safe. and Env. Eng, 12 61 –4 (2005). Google Scholar

[7] 

Xu, X. Z. and Pan, B. L., Nuc. Safe, 16 74 –9 (2017). Google Scholar

[8] 

Zhang, E. Q., Liu, X. Y. and Han, H., Energ. Technol. and Manage, 39 11 –4 (2014). Google Scholar

[9] 

Lin, L., “Study on the classification of safety production supervision of chemical enterprises based on risk supervision theory,” Energ. Chemic. Indus, 42 61 –6 (2021). Google Scholar

[10] 

Chen, J., Chen, L. and Wang, D. Y., J. Chongqing Jiaotong U. (Nat. Sci.), 36 95 –101 (2017). Google Scholar

[11] 

Liang, Y. X., Li, Q. M., Qin, X., and Liu, Y., J. Safe. Sci.and Technol, 16 163 –8 (2020). Google Scholar

[12] 

Xie, P. and Lu, P. F., J. Safe. Sci.and Technol, 14 187 –92 (2018). Google Scholar
© (2022) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Yujie Ren, Xunxian Shi, Xingqiang Tian, Shengxiang Ma, and Bing Chen "Classification method for safety status of industrial enterprise based on BP neural network", Proc. SPIE 12506, Third International Conference on Computer Science and Communication Technology (ICCSCT 2022), 125065Y (28 December 2022); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2662021
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Safety

Neural networks

Classification systems

Data modeling

Inspection equipment

Injuries

Inspection

Back to Top