|
1.INTRODUCTIONWith the rapid development of industrialisation, safety has been an important issue not only because of an increase in public awareness but also due to the higher standard of occupational health and safety. The dangers in industrial processes and the weakness in safety management can cause incident which brings loss of lives and properties. Avoiding this serious threat for economic development has been a target for government and industrial enterprises1. Thanks to the recent development of safety science and technology, several studies on safety in industry are carried out by government, enterprises and academic organizations2. An amount of safety techniques, such as regulation research, Work Safety Standardisation, Occupational Health and Safety Management System certification and Safety Culture Construction, are widely adopted in different areas. It is meaningful for enterprise to discover the weakness of safety status and refine improvements. It also provides recommendations for government supervision focusing on different enterprises which are evaluated and ranked. Due to the diversity of safety elements in the industry, it is difficult to cover all of them. Several important aspects are taken into consideration which form an index system in this paper, based on that evaluation and classification can be undertaken. The BP neural network is selected in building evaluation and classification model, which is mature enough to be applied. The input signal transmits forward in this multi-layer feedforward neural network, and information is processing layer by layer until the output. When it cannot achieve the expected output, the error is propagated back to adjust the weights and thresholds, and make the result constantly approach the expected output3-4. 2.SAFETY INDEX SYSTEMAfter analysing the factors that are considered in relevant research in several areas5-12, a safety index system is constructed which contains 5 factors: Safety Management, Safety Condition, Incident Emergency, Safety Indicator and Safety Advance. 20 properties are considered to support the factors. The safety index system is shown in Table 1, where Fi refers to the factor, Pj refers to the property. Table 1.Safety index system of industrial enterprise.
3.CLASSIFICATION MODEL3.1ClassificationBased on the safety index system, the safety status of industrial enterprise can be classified into 4 levels: D, C, B and A, where A is the highest level. 3.2Data collectionConsidering enterprises on different levels, 20 samples are selected as training and test samples. Expert scoring method is used to score on 20 properties for each sample. The flow chart of expert scoring is expressed in Figure 1. Five experienced experts from government, enterprises and institution are invited and score following the scoring rules shown in Table 2. A final classification conclusion is also drawn for each sample. 20 sets of data are recorded. The number of the samples on D, C, B and A level are respectively 2, 3, 3 and 2. Table 2.The scoring rules for expert scoring.
3.3BP neural network designA BP neural network which structure contains three-layer: input-layer, hidden-layer and output-layer, is suitable enough for model building and data computation in this paper. According to the number of properties and classification levels, the number of nodes in input-layer is 20, and the number of nodes in output-layer is 4. The number of nodes in hidden-layer is intended to be 11 by calculation based on the empirical equation below. where n, m and s are respectively the number of nodes in input-layer, output-layer and hidden-layer. Thus, a BP neural network is designed which structure is “20-11-4”. The topological graph is drawn in Figure 2. where xi refers to input data, yi refers to output data. INi HNi and ONi respectively refers to node in input-layer, hidden-layer and output-layer. 3.4Network building, training and testInput data are 20 sets of numbers range from 0 to 4. Output data are 20 sets of classification results, which are all transformed to [1 0 0 0], [0 1 0 0], [0 0 1 0] and [0 0 0 1] that separately refer to the level of D, C, B and A. The number of input data and output data are separated as shown in Table 3. Table 3.Training and test data separation.
Several codes are written to build a BP neural network in MATLAB®. The maximum number of training times is set to 1000, the training error is set to 0.0001, the learning rate is set to 0.01. Training data are input in the network, then the program is run until it reaches the set parameters. Subsequently, this network is tested by inputting the test data. In order to make a comparison between test results and expected outputs, a plot is drawn as shown in Figure 3. The round symbols refer to the test results and the star symbols refer to the expected outputs. Abscissa refers to the number of test samples, and the ordinate refers to level of safety status D (1), C (2), B (3) and A (4). From the plot, it can be seen that the round symbols exactly coincide the star symbols, which means that test results give a good fit to expected outputs and the accuracy rate is nearly 100%. Therefore, it is proved that this BP neural network is accurate enough to be applied for classification of safety status in industry. 4.APPLICATIONThis method is applied to help the local government to evaluate and classify safety status of enterprises. Two of them, H and J, are chosen to be classified using the classification model based on BP neural network which is well trained and tested. Five experienced experts from government, enterprises and institution are invited and score following the scoring rules in the same way. The average of five scores is considered as the final score for each property. All of the scores are shown in Table 4 below. Table 4.Input data of application samples.
After inputting the data and running the model program, the results show [0.375 1.0529 -0.1871 -0.0243] and [0.1469 0.23345 -0.0566 0.7581]. The values most approaching to 1 in two samples appear in the second and forth position, thus they can be approximately called [0 1 0 0] and [0 0 0 1]. That means enterprise H is on C level and enterprise J is on A level. This results well satisfy the expectation of experts. A decision is finally made by the local government that safety inspection will be undertaken once a month for enterprise H and twice a year for enterprise J. 5.CONCLUSIONSThe scope of this research is to explore a scientific classification method for safety status of industrial enterprise. A safety index system contains numerous properties is constructed and makes a contribution for model building. Enterprises can be classified into 4 levels by using the classification model based on BP neural network. It is proved that this model can be accurately applied in industry. This classification method will be helpful for safety management of government and enterprises themselves. ACKNOWLEDGMENTSSincere thanks are expressed to China Academy of Safety Science and Technology for providing support by Basic Research Fund of China Academy of Safety Science and Technology (Grant No. 2022JBKY10). REFERENCESZhao, J. H.,
“Preview on the assessment of safety quantity standardizing of industry and commerce trade enterprise,”
J. Safe. Sci.and Technol, 7 212
–5
(2011). Google Scholar
Wu, A. X. and Ruan, R. L., J. Xianning U, 31 86
–9
(2011). Google Scholar
Gao, D. Q.,
“On structures of supervised linear basis function feedforward three-layered neural networks,”
Ch. J. Comput, 21 80
–6
(1998). Google Scholar
Liu, H. T., Han, W. H. and Jia, Y.,
“Construction of network security indication-system based on back propagation neural network,”
Net. Infor. Secur, 4 26
–9
(2018). Google Scholar
Wen, C., Zhang, L., Meng, B. and Zuo, Q., Henan Sci, 38 1660
–8
(2020). Google Scholar
Deng, B. and Song, R., Safe. and Env. Eng, 12 61
–4
(2005). Google Scholar
Xu, X. Z. and Pan, B. L., Nuc. Safe, 16 74
–9
(2017). Google Scholar
Zhang, E. Q., Liu, X. Y. and Han, H., Energ. Technol. and Manage, 39 11
–4
(2014). Google Scholar
Lin, L.,
“Study on the classification of safety production supervision of chemical enterprises based on risk supervision theory,”
Energ. Chemic. Indus, 42 61
–6
(2021). Google Scholar
Chen, J., Chen, L. and Wang, D. Y., J. Chongqing Jiaotong U. (Nat. Sci.), 36 95
–101
(2017). Google Scholar
Liang, Y. X., Li, Q. M., Qin, X., and Liu, Y., J. Safe. Sci.and Technol, 16 163
–8
(2020). Google Scholar
Xie, P. and Lu, P. F., J. Safe. Sci.and Technol, 14 187
–92
(2018). Google Scholar
|