Paper
22 March 1999 Comparison of artificial and natural neural computation: an application to automatic target recognition
Karina E. Waldemark, Vlatko Becanovic, Jason M. Kinser, Thomas Lindblad, Clark S. Lindsey, Geza Szekely
Author Affiliations +
Proceedings Volume 3728, Ninth Workshop on Virtual Intelligence/Dynamic Neural Networks; (1999) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.343035
Event: Ninth Workshop on Virtual Intelligence/Dynamic Neural Networks: Neural Networks Fuzzy Systems, Evolutionary Systems and Virtual Re, 1998, Stockholm, Sweden
Abstract
We make a few simple comparisons of the principles and performance for noise reduction and edge detection with conventional methods versus neural network methods. Noise reduction methods discussed include the wavelet packet transform. Edge detection is discussed from the point of view of the Sobel and Canny transforms. An approach using the IBM ZISC036 neural network chip is also discussed. In all cases, the results are compare to that of the biologically inspired PCNN. An application of the `best if both worlds' is demonstrated in a foveation/object isolation application for ATR.
© (1999) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Karina E. Waldemark, Vlatko Becanovic, Jason M. Kinser, Thomas Lindblad, Clark S. Lindsey, and Geza Szekely "Comparison of artificial and natural neural computation: an application to automatic target recognition", Proc. SPIE 3728, Ninth Workshop on Virtual Intelligence/Dynamic Neural Networks, (22 March 1999); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.343035
Lens.org Logo
CITATIONS
Cited by 1 scholarly publication.
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Neural networks

Edge detection

Denoising

Image segmentation

Neurons

Automatic target recognition

Binary data

RELATED CONTENT


Back to Top