Open Access
5 April 2017 Ryanodine and IP3 receptor-mediated calcium signaling play a pivotal role in neurological infrared laser modulation
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
Pulsed infrared (IR) laser energy has been shown to modulate neurological activity through both stimulation and inhibition of action potentials. While the mechanism(s) behind this phenomenon is (are) not completely understood, certain hypotheses suggest that the rise in temperature from IR exposure could activate temperature- or pressure-sensitive ion channels or create pores in the cellular outer membrane, allowing an influx of typically plasma-membrane-impermeant ions. Studies using fluorescent intensity-based calcium ion ( Ca 2 + ) sensitive dyes show changes in Ca 2 + levels after various IR stimulation parameters, which suggests that Ca 2 + may originate from the external solution. However, activation of intracellular signaling pathways has also been demonstrated, indicating a more complex mechanism of increasing intracellular Ca 2 + concentration. We quantified the Ca 2 + mobilization in terms of influx from the external solution and efflux from intracellular organelles using Fura-2 and a high-speed ratiometric imaging system that rapidly alternates the dye excitation wavelengths. Using nonexcitable Chinese hamster ovarian ( CHO - hM 1 ) cells and neuroblastoma-glioma (NG108) cells, we demonstrate that intracellular IP 3 receptors play an important role in the IR-induced Ca 2 + , with the

1.

Introduction

Application of infrared (IR) laser pulses with wavelengths ranging from 1.4 to 2.1  μm and pulse durations in the order of micro- to milliseconds has been shown to directly stimulate nerves without any chemical pretreatment or genetic alteration.18 Likewise, 1.8  μm IR pulse exposure has also been demonstrated to block action potential (AP) generation and propagation.913 While a rapid increase in temperature, due to absorption of the laser radiation, is required to evoke the neural depolarization, and IR stimulation pulses have been shown to produce an acoustic pressure wave,1417 the mechanism(s) to stimulate or inhibit an AP is not fully understood.18 Certain thermal and mechanical mechanisms17,19 involving ion channels, such as transient receptor potential (TRP) channel activation,20 plasma membrane poration,21 and/or membrane potential changes, are suggested as explanations for IR neural stimulation and inhibition, together termed IR neural modulation (INM).1 Shapiro et al.22,23 also showed that the rapid temperature change slightly depolarizes the plasma membrane through capacitive charging. This effect could initiate AP firing in neurons but cannot explain IR-induced neuronal inhibition.

While much research into the mechanisms underlying IR stimulation has focused on the interaction of the IR pulse with plasma membrane, the diverse responses to INM suggest the possibility that intracellular physiological regulatory and compensatory mechanisms are involved in observed cell behavior. A critical role of intracellular Ca2+ regulation in cellular stimulation from thermal gradients has been indicated in several cell types. In HeLa cells, thermal rises of only a few tenths degrees, but 1- to 2-s long, have been shown to create a slight uptake of Ca2+ by sarco/endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+/ATPase (SERCA) and then an overshoot of cytoplasmic free Ca2+ from the ER due to IP3-channels activation.24 Additionally, IR-induced intracellular Ca2+ transients originating from mitochondrial stores have been shown to be sufficient to modulate the activity of excitable neonatal cardiomyocytes, spiral and vestibular ganglion neurons.25,26 However, the addition of endoplasmic ryanodine receptors (RyR) blockers significantly reduced IR-induced Ca2+ response as well. IR pulses could also produce contraction of cardiomyocytes in the Ca2+-free media and without noticeable Ca2+ transients.27,28 These results suggest that internal Ca2+ modulatory mechanisms might dominate over Ca2+ influx during IR stimulation.

Recently, we demonstrated that in nonexcitable CHO cells, a 3.1-mJ IR pulse exposure initiates the phosphatidylinositol4,5-biphosphate (PIP2) intracellular signaling cascade.21 This critical physiological regulatory mechanism culminates in production of multiple second messengers, including IP3-dependent intracellular Ca2+ release and activation of Ca2+-dependent phospholipase C (PLC) and protein kinase C (PKC).2931 Intracellular activity of PKC has been implicated in the modulation of thermo-sensitive TRP channels (TRPV1-4, TRPM8, and TRPA1).32,33 PIP2 signaling is also involved in regulation and sensitization of the store-operated TRP channels (SOC),3437 some of which are reported to be the core of the mechanosensitive system of mammalian cells.3840 Neuronal voltage-gated Ca2+ channels (VGCC), SOC, thermo- and mechanosensitive TRP channels all transport Ca2+ into the cells and could be responsible for IR-induced intracellular Ca2+ increase as an alternative to possible plasma membrane nanoporation.21 Ca2+ also plays multiple roles in cellular physiology, including acting as a charge carrier across the plasma membrane and as a second messenger itself, enabling additional modulatory mechanisms. Thus, it is not surprising that intracellular Ca2+ fluctuations are accepted as one of the main hallmarks of neuronal excitability and could be a critical component for understanding the mechanisms of IR-induced neurological stimulation or inhibition.

In this paper, we provide data to progress the fundamental understanding of IR modulation of neurons by revealing the dependence of IR-induced Ca2+ mobilization on activation of intracellular Ca2+ stores and Ca2+ itself, whether from an internal or extracellular origin. By using ratiometric calcium imaging, we obtain quantitative measurements of calcium concentration to limit potential complications of intensity-based calcium indicators in environments with changing baseline cytosolic Ca2+ concentrations. Since mitochondrial Ca2+ cycling is important in regulation of Ca2+ homeostasis of all mammalian cells, we also use the innate difference in Ca2+ stores between nonexcitable and excitable (neuron-derived) cell types to compare the sensitivity of IR-induced Ca2+ response to these stores. CHO-hM1, a nonexcitable cell line that lacks VGCCs,41 and rodent NG108 neuroblastoma, a neuro-derived cell line that does not produce AP in an early undifferentiated state but does contain multiple voltage-gated channels,42 were used to directly compare the sensitivity of IR-induced Ca2+ response without confounding effects from AP.

2.

Materials and Methods

2.1.

Cell Culture

Rodent neuroblastoma-glioma cells (NG108) were grown in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium without sodium pyruvate containing 10% fetal bovine serum, 1  I.U./mL penicillin, 0.1  μg/mL streptomycin, 0.1 mM hypoxanthine, 400 nM aminopterin, and 0.016 mM thymidine. Chinese hamster ovarian cells (CHO-hM1) stably expressing human muscarinic acetylcholine receptor type 1 (hM1) were grown in F-12K medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum, 1  I.U./mL penicillin, and 0.1  μg/mL streptomycin. Geneticin® (G418) is used in the CHO medium to maintain the hM1 expressing phenotype. Both cell lines were cultured at 37°C, 5% CO2, and 95% humidity.

2.2.

Solutions

Solutions were exchanged through bath application using a Warner Instruments perfusion system at a flow rate of 2  mL/min. Unless otherwise noted, in most experiments, we used a standard external buffer solution (pH 7.4, 290 to 310 mOsm) that consisted of 2 mM magnesium chloride (MgCl2), 5 mM potassium chloride (KCL), 10 mM (4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid) (HEPES), 10 mM glucose, 2 mM calcium chloride (CaCl2), and 135 mM sodium chloride (NaCl). In some experiments (which are noted in the text), the CaCl2 was replaced with 2 mM Na-ethylene glycol-bis(β-aminoethyl ether)-N,N,N′,N′-tetraacetic acid (EGTA) to create Ca2+-free external buffer.

To investigate the sources of IR-induced intracellular Ca2+ rises and compare IR effects with well-known effects caused by endogenous PLC activation, some experiments were paired with Gq/11-coupled hM1 receptor agonist, oxotremorine (OxoM, 10  μM), Gq/11-coupled B1 receptor agonist, bradykinin (BK, 100 nM), or RyR agonist caffeine (10 mM). Additionally, we used IP3 receptor (IP3R) blockers xestospongin C (XeC 20  μM), 2-aminoethoxydiphenil borate (2-APB 50  μM), and RyR blocker ryanodine (10  μM). Media, chemicals, and pharmaceuticals were obtained from Life Technologies, Tocris Bioscience, or Sigma-Aldrich. In initial experiments, propidium iodide (PI) (BD Bioscience) was added to the external solution to a concentration of 4  μM to verify cell viability43 and safe IR fiber placement.

2.3.

Infrared Laser Stimulation

An Acculight Capella IR diode laser (Lockheed Martin) with a center wavelength of 1869 nm was used to stimulate the cells. As demonstrated in Fig. 1(a), the laser light was delivered to the sample by a 200-μm core optical fiber. A 90-μm region in the center of the fluorescent image was used to analyze the Ca2+ response, to ensure uniformity of exposure [Fig. 1(b), green circle]. The fiber tip (top edge) was positioned by a micromanipulator about 90  μm away from the center to avoid obstruction of the region of interest by the fiber. The laser pulse was synchronized with the microscope using the Olympus real-time controller. The rapid rise temperature during stimulation caused intensity fluctuations in the images, possibly from thermal lensing. This “spiking” artifact effect was manually removed from data sets for clear presentation of IR-induced intracellular Ca2+ changes.

Fig. 1

(a) Diagram showing the position of the IR fiber in relation to the sample and (b) actual image of the cells and optical fiber. Cells in the green circle were used for measurements. The delivery fiber is outlined in red. PI is shown as the red fluorescence signal overlay. (From Olsovsky et al.46)

NPH_4_2_025001_f001.png

All IR stimulation experiments were performed with the laser set to deliver 5 pulses (a 1-s, 5-Hz pulse train) with individual pulse durations from 2 (2.5 mJ) to 3 ms (3.8 mJ). Pulse energy was determined at the fiber and the absorption of water was not taken into account. To ensure that the IR laser pulse was not acutely damaging the cells, uptake of PI was monitored after IR pulse exposure. Uptake of PI can indicate damage to the plasma membrane and PI was seen in cells were directly beneath and in front of the fiber where the temperature rises were significantly higher [Fig. 1(b)]. Thus, the cells that were used for experiments [Fig. 1(b), green circle] were selected from a region that did not demonstrate any PI uptake after many minutes after the IR exposure.

2.4.

Measurement of Calcium

Cells were plated on poly-L-lysine coated glass coverslips and kept in a 37°C, humidified (5% CO2) incubator for 24 to 48 h before imaging. The cells were then loaded with Fura-2 Ca2+ probe in a standard external buffer solution containing 5  μM Fura-2 and 0.05% pluronic acid at 20°C for 30 min. The dye solution was then replaced with standard outside buffer solution for at least 15 min before imaging.

Fluorescent images were recorded using an Olympus epi-fluorescence microscope with a Lambda DG arc lamp and filter, a Hamamatsu Orca Flash 4.0 sCMOS camera, and an Olympus real-time controller. The real-time controller synchronizes the Lambda filter and camera so that an image using 340-nm excitation wavelength is captured immediately before another image using 380-nm excitation wavelength. The two images are compiled into a ratiometric image. The measured background and average autofluorescence for each cell line were subtracted before calculating the ratio. This ratio correlates to the concentration of calcium and is less vulnerable to artifact caused by variations in intensity due to, for example, defocus or sample thickness. The ratios were converted to Ca2+ concentrations using the following equation:

[Ca2+]free=β×Kd×RRminRmaxR,
where R is the measured ratio from the image and Kd is the dissociation constant of Fura-2 as reported by Grynkiewicz et al.44 Rmin, Rmax, and β are the minimum ratio, maximum ratio, and scaling factor, respectively, obtained by using Fura-2 calibration kit from Invitrogen. The calibration kit samples were pH 7.2, ionic strength 100 mM KCl, and 50  μM Fura-2. Rmin is the measured ratio from the images of the sample containing 0  μM free calcium and Rmax is the ratio from the images of the sample containing 39  μM free Ca2+ (beyond saturation of Fura-2). β is the fluorescence using 380-nm excitation on the 0  μM free Ca2+ sample over the fluorescence from the 39  μM free Ca2+ sample. The final values used in our experiments for Kd, Rmin, Rmax, and β were 224 nM, 0.207, 7.18, and 7.5, respectively.

3.

Results and Discussion

3.1.

Intracellular Ca2+ After Infrared Exposure

The resulting traces for the intracellular Ca2+ concentration increase after IR pulse exposures are shown in Fig. 2. A train of five IR pulses of 2, 2.5, or 3 ms duration started 660 ms after the beginning of image acquisition and lasted for 800 ms. In the Ca2+-containing standard outside buffer solution, noticeable intracellular Ca2+ increases appeared during IR pulses and peaked 260 ms after the train in both NG108 and CHO-hM1. Ca2+ rise began immediately after the first IR pulse and increased with each subsequent pulse and has previously been shown to be evoked by each laser pulse.45 The mean amplitudes at the peak of intracellular Ca2+ after 2 and 2.5 ms IR trains were significantly lower in CHO-hM1 than in NG108 [Figs. 2(a) and 2(b)]. The delta changes were 12.3±3.7  nM (n=20) versus 83.3±21.1  nM (n=9) for 2 ms IR pulse trials and 26.4±11.4  nM (n=20) versus 340.8±106.8 (n=5) for 2.5 ms pulses for CHO-hM1 versus NG108, respectively (p0.0001, unpaired two-tailed t-test). For the longer pulses [Fig. 2(c), 3 ms, 3.8 mJ], the intracellular Ca2+ increases were much higher than at lower IR pulses amplitudes, but increases observed between CHO-hM1 and NG108 become statistically insignificant (403.1±58  nM, n=32 versus 435.19±105.4  nM, n=19, respectively, p0.77). Additionally, intracellular Ca2+ rise reaches a plateau 1.5 s after the end of the pulse train in CHO-hM1 but continues to rise in NG108 exposed cells. We then compared the increase in intracellular Ca2+ after a train of 3 ms pulses in Ca2+-chelated extracellular media [Fig. 2(d)]. We found these intracellular Ca2+ concentration increases to be much smaller than in experiments with Ca2+-containing external solution (postexposure ΔCa2+i18.4±5.7  nM, n=21 for CHO-hM1 and 146.2±59.4  nM, n=18 for NG108), but still determined significant.

Fig. 2

Comparison of intracellular Ca2+ increases after train of IR pulses of different duration between NG108 and CHO-hM1 cell lines. (a–c) Exposures were performed in Ca2+ containing extracellular media. (d) Experiments performed in Ca2+ chelated outside media. Error bars (gray area) represent the standard error (SE) of the mean of 5 to 32 cells per group. Vertical ticks above x-axis indicate the IR pulses train.

NPH_4_2_025001_f002.png

From our previous work suggesting that Ca2+ rises from IR pulse exposure were due to Ca2+ influx from extracellular media,21,46 we hypothesized that the exposure may create small pores in the plasma membrane. However, the presence of an intracellular Ca2+ rise in the absence of external Ca2+ suggests that Ca2+ increases after IR exposure is not the result of simple passive diffusion through a permeabilized plasma membrane, but rather, a complex and regulated process, possibly through the involvement of IP3-sensitive endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stores and Ca2+-induced-Ca2+-release (CICR) from ryanodine-sensitive Ca2+ stores. Additionally, in both Ca2+-containing and Ca2+-chelated solution, CHO-hM1 did not exhibit as high a Ca2+ increase as NG108. The composition and distribution of plasma membrane ion channels responsible for normal cellular homeostasis and function are markedly different between mammalian excitable and nonexcitable cells. Similar differences are also present in the membranes of major intracellular Ca2+ stores. For example, muscular, neuronal, and cardiomyocyte cells widely express both RyR and IP3R in the sarco-ER, but nonexcitable cells express mostly intracellular IP3R.47 The differences in expression in the ER of RyR and IP3R in excitable and nonexcitable cells could be one of the main regulatory mechanisms responsible for the sensitivity of these cells to external stressors, such as IR stimulation.

Furthermore, the Ca2+ rise can be blocked in IR-exposed NG108 and CHO-hM1 in Ca2+-chelated external media supplemented with thapsigargin.46 Thapsigargin blocks SERCA, which normally pumps Ca2+ from the cytosol into the lumen of the sarco-ER,4850 thereby resulting in the depletion of intracellular stores. Remaining Ca2+ is eventually cleared by plasma membrane Ca2+ pumps.51 Thus, the lack of a Ca2+ increase after IR stimulation seen in these depleted cells suggests that increase in Ca2+-free solution may originate from ER or ryanodine-sensitive Ca2+ stores.

3.2.

Role of Intracellular Ca2+ Stores in Ca2+ Rises After Infrared Exposure

To investigate the role that these Ca2+ stores may be playing in the INM response, we then performed a series of experiments with agonists of the RyR and IP3R in NG108 and CHO-hM1. First, to demonstrate the functional expression of intracellular ER receptors and capability of NG108 to adjust to changes in extracellular Ca2+, a series of solution changes were conducted during Ca2+ imaging (Fig. 3). NG108 were bathed in Ca2+-chelated buffer for 30 min before beginning ratiometric Ca2+ imaging to partially deplete intracellular Ca2+ out of the unstimulated cells.52 The normal resting intracellular Ca2+ concentration is between 50 and 100 nM,53,54 but this exposure depleted it to 15±3  nM [Fig 3(a)]. Shortly after beginning perfusion of cells with Ca2+-containing solution, the resting intracellular Ca2+ concentration reached a normal 52±3  nM due to a capacitive Ca2+ entry mechanism. Treatment of NG108 with 100 nM BK peptide caused activation of the Gq/11-coupled B1 receptors, consequentially initiating PIP2 signaling and production of the IP3. After the IP3-induced Ca2+ spike, we applied 2-APB (50  μM) in Ca2+-chelated buffer to block IP3R and slightly deplete intracellular Ca2+ stores.55 This manipulation prevented the IP3-induced Ca2+ spike after secondary application of the BK and confirmed the functional role of IP3R in NG108. Similarly, CHO-hM1 stably expresses the Gq/11-coupled hM1 receptors, so application of a high concentration of hM1 agonist OxoM (10  μM) resulted in a strong IP3-dependent Ca2+ response [Fig. 3(b)].29 To demonstrate CICR from ryanodine stores, we applied caffeine (10 mM) to sensitize RyR and allowed basal cytosolic calcium levels to actuate CICR.56,57 A cytoplasmic Ca2+ rise can be seen in the NG108, but CHO-hM1, which do not contain ryanodine stores, shows no response [Figs. 3(c) and 3(d)].

To investigate the role of RyR and IP3R in the IR-induced changes in intracellular Ca2+ dynamics, we exposed both NG108 and CHO-hM1 to a 3-ms IR pulses train in the presence of several receptor antagonists. Antagonists of RyR and IP3R dramatically reduced IR-induced intracellular Ca2+ response in both cell lines [Fig. 4(a)], suggesting that physiological Ca2+ regulatory mechanisms are predominate in the cellular response to IR stimulation.

Fig. 3

Intracellular RyR and IP3Rs in the NG108 and CHO-hM1 cells. (a) Demonstration of the NG108 cells (n=9) capability to adjust to changes in extracellular Ca2+ concentration and respond to 100 nM BK-induced IP3Rs activation. (b) OxoM (10  μM)-induced intracellular Ca2+ rise in CHO-hM1 cells (n=15) due to ER IP3Rs activation. (c) Caffeine (10 mM)-induced Ca2+ increase due to intracellular RyR receptors activation in the NG108 cells (n=17). (d) Lack of response to 10 mM caffeine in CHO-hM1 cells (n=18). Error bars (black outline with gray area fill) represent the SE of the mean.

NPH_4_2_025001_f003.png

Fig. 4

NG108 and CHO-hM1 Ca2+ responses in Ca2+-containing outside buffer after trains of 3-ms duration IR pulses with and without intracellular RyR and IP3R blockers. (a) IR-induced changes in intracellular Ca2+ dynamics. The traces without antagonists are the same as in Fig. 2 and presented here for comparison. Vertical ticks above x-axis indicate the IR pulses train. (b) Magnification of the Ca2+ responses with RyR and IP3R antagonists. Error bars (black outline with gray or black/gray checked pattern fill areas) represent the SE of the mean (n=11 to 16).

NPH_4_2_025001_f004.png

The IP3 stores, as shown above (Fig. 4), are present in both NG108 and CHO-hM1. We pretreated CHO-hM1 cells for 20 min with XeC (20  μM), a specific inhibitor of the IP3-dependent Ca2+ release.58 In CHO-hM1, XeC nearly completely blocked the rise in intracellular Ca2+ levels (postexposure ΔCa2+i3.3±0.5  nM, n=13), even in Ca2+-containing outside buffer. Despite the fact that such a small response is within normal intracellular Ca2+ physiological fluctuations, the rise correlates temporally with IR exposure [Fig. 4(b)]. This small increase could be due to capacitive entry of extracellular Ca2+ through diacylglycerol (DAG)-sensitive TRP/SOC channels or from incomplete block of the IP3R.34,35,59,60 In NG108, a similar small intracellular Ca2+ response could lead to CICR from RyR Ca2+ stores. Indeed, IR stimulation of NG108 cells in Ca2+-chelated outside buffer and treated with XeC (20  μM) resulted in a small, but significant Ca2+ rise (postexposure ΔCa2+i38.2±6.4  nM, n=11). Additionally, NG108 pretreated with RyR antagonist ryanodine61 (10  μM) in Ca2+-containing buffer, showed a large reduction in Ca2+ rise after IR stimulation (postexposure ΔCa2+i16.1±6.2  nM, n=16), with the small rise in Ca2+ possibly resulting from IP3 stores or capacitive entry37,40 without CICR [Fig. 4(b)]. These results show that IP3 stores are involved in Ca2+ signaling from INM in both cell lines but are not the sole Ca2+ source in NG108.

Our observations further suggest that differences between excitable and nonexcitable cells in IR-induced Ca2+ responses could be due to distinct expression of intracellular RyR and IP3R in the ER of these cells. RyR and IP3R have been shown to be activated in parallel with store-operated Ca2+ entry (SOCE) and strongly contribute to the global Ca2+ response.62 Depletion of these intracellular Ca2+ stores can initiate SOCE through plasma membrane SOC channels. Thus, much of the observed Ca2+ increase in the NG108 could be due to direct or indirect activation of RyR and additional to SOCE intracellular Ca2+ regulatory mechanism. In NG108, it has been demonstrated that depolarization-induced Ca2+ entry evoked CICR only from the ryanodine-sensitive stores,63 which greatly contribute to general Ca2+ response.

Previous experiments on HeLa cells, cardiomyocytes, and neurons have demonstrated the critical role of intracellular Ca2+ regulation in thermal gradient stimulation mechanisms. In HeLa cells, during second-long heating of <1  deg, a decrease in Ca2+ was observed, theorized to be due to an increase of SERCA activity along with a decrease in the open probability of the ER IP3R and RyR. After the exposure, the rapid cooling was hypothesized to increase the open probability of these ER Ca2+ conducting channels, leading to an overshoot of cytoplasmic Ca2+. This IR-induced Ca2+ uptake by SERCAs and its asymmetrical outflow via intracellular ER IP3R were proposed as a general mechanism of the temperature-dependent changes in Ca2+ dynamics.24 While we did not observe a decrease in Ca2+ in these experiments, due to the brevity of our pulses and experimental parameters, this hypothesized sensitivity of the ER IP3R could contributed the Ca2+ overshoot observed from IR pulses. IR rapid heating/cooling of water also creates capacitive photothermal currents, which results in plasma membrane depolarization/repolarization19 and thus possible activation of the voltage sensitive phosphatase (Ci-VSP). Recently, Ci-VSP was shown to regulate PIP2 signaling in the plasma membrane6466 and could be accounted for the initial depletion during IR-induced cellular response.

Previous IR pulse experiments in cardiomyocytes and spiral and vestibular ganglion neurons indicated that the calcium signaling originated from the mitochondria. However, three (ryanodine, cyclopiazonic acid, and ruthenium red) of the pharmaceutical compounds used in these studies have direct severe inhibitory effect on the RyR and ER, indicating a likely critical importance of internal Ca2+ ER pools/receptors in IR-induced INM in addition to alteration of mitochondrial function.26 By using two cell lines with innate differences in ER receptors, we demonstrate the role that the interplay between these two receptors has on the response the IR exposure.

Previously, we found that IR pulses initiated the intracellular phosphoinositide PIP2 signaling cascade in CHO-hM1.21 This response appeared similar to one initiated by activation of Gq/11-coupled receptors and resulted in IP3 production with possible consequential depletion of the intracellular ER Ca2+ stores. IP3 is a main component of the intracellular calcium signaling and provides a direct link between cellular plasma membrane and prime intracellular Ca2+ store, the ER.30,6770 The exact mechanism of IR-induced activation of PIP2 signaling is unknown, but hypothetical schematics of the IR-induced Ca2+ responses are presented in Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Simplified hypothetical schematic of IR-induced Ca2+ response between (a) nonexcitable and (b) excitable cells.

NPH_4_2_025001_f005.png

In nonexcitable cells [Fig. 5(a)], IR-induced PLC-dependent PIP2 hydrolysis or depletion leads to production of IP3 and DAG (green arrows). DAG and its derivative, arachidonic acid, activate Ca2+-conducting TRP SOC channels34,35,40,60 and IP3 initiates intracellular Ca2+ release through activation of IP3R on the ER (blue arrows out of ER). Intracellular Ca2+ activates cytoplasmic PKC, which has a high affinity to DAG.71,72 Active PKC translocates toward DAG (purple arrows) and phosphorylates TRP channels, keeping them in the open state longer.73 Extracellular Ca2+ started to influx into cytosol through TRP/SOC channels due to the SOCE mechanism (red arrows). High levels of intracellular Ca2+ catalyze PLC activity, leading to stronger PIP2 hydrolysis, and potentiating the reaction described above.29,74 High intracellular Ca2+ is eventually pumped out of the cell by plasma membrane Ca2+-ATPase and into ER stores by SERCA.75,76 In excitable, specifically neuronal cells [Fig. 5(b)], in addition to the reactions described above and SOCE, the intracellular Ca2+ increase is achieved through additional mechanisms, including strong sensitization of neurons by IP3 and Ca2+-activated ryanodine-sensitive Ca2+ release.63,7779 The interplay of these two intracellular Ca2+ pools is critically important, since it leads to much stronger phenotypic Ca2+ response. Ca2+- and PIP2-dependent modulation of the neuronal potassium channels leads to changes in membrane potential and depolarization.30,80 As a consequence of depolarization and activation of the VGCC, Ca2+ influx could also evoke CICR through RyR receptors.63,79 Last, the overall neuronal activity induces Ca2+ influx through excitatory neurotransmitters and receptor-operated Ca2+ channels.8184 Therefore, IR-induced changes of intracellular Ca2+ signaling and dynamics in neurons can explain both stimulation and modulation mechanisms. While additional studies are needed, our experiments presented here indicate that intracellular IP3R in the ER play an important role in both excitable and nonexcitable cell lines, with the IR-induced Ca2+ response augmented by RyR in excitable cells, thus strongly reinforcing our hypothesis.

4.

Conclusions

This study directly compared Ca2+ mobilization in two very different cells lines, neuronal-like NG108 and epithelial CHO-hM1, to determine the source of Ca2+ rise resulting from INM. As both NG108 and CHO-hM1 cell models demonstrate an increase in intracellular Ca2+ after IR stimulation, the results suggest that Ca2+ influx from extracellular space is accompanied by Ca2+ derived from the intracellular IP3 and ryanodine-sensitive Ca2+ stores. However, the intracellular Ca2+ response in NG108 cells was determined significantly greater, suggesting that interplay of IP3 and ryanodine intracellular Ca2+ pools is critically important to augment the Ca2+ rise through CICR after an IR pulsed exposure event.

Disclosures

The authors have no additional relevant financial interests or potential conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Air Force Office of Scientific Research (LRIR #15RHCOR204). Support for Mr. Cory A. Olsovsky was provided by a Repperger Research Intern Program administered by the Air Force Research Laboratory, 711th Human Performance Wing. CHO-hM1 cells were donated by Dr. Mark S. Shapiro (University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, Department of Physiology).

References

1. 

C. P. Richter et al., “Neural stimulation with optical radiation,” Laser Photonics Rev., 5 (1), 68 –80 (2011). http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lpor.v5.1 Google Scholar

2. 

C. P. Richter et al., “Spread of cochlear excitation during stimulation with pulsed infrared radiation: inferior colliculus measurements,” J. Neural Eng., 8 (5), 056006 (2011). http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1741-2560/8/5/056006 Google Scholar

3. 

I. U. Teudt et al., “Optical stimulation of the facial nerve: a new monitoring technique?,” Laryngoscope, 117 (9), 1641 –1647 (2007). http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MLG.0b013e318074ec00 Google Scholar

4. 

J. Wells et al., “Optical stimulation of neural tissue in vivo,” Opt. Lett., 30 (5), 504 –506 (2005). http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OL.30.000504 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar

5. 

A. I. Matic et al., “Behavioral and electrophysiological responses evoked by chronic infrared neural stimulation of the cochlea,” PLoS One, 8 (3), e58189 (2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058189 POLNCL 1932-6203 Google Scholar

6. 

M. Chernov and A. W. Roe, “Infrared neural stimulation: a new stimulation tool for central nervous system applications,” Neurophotonics, 1 (1), 011011 (2014). http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.NPh.1.1.011011 Google Scholar

7. 

M. W. Jenkins et al., “Optical pacing of the embryonic heart,” Nat. Photonics, 4 623 –626 (2010). http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2010.166 Google Scholar

8. 

A. C. Thompson, P. R. Stoddart and E. D. Jansen, “Optical stimulation of neurons,” Curr. Mol. Imaging, 3 (2), 162 –177 (2014). http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/2211555203666141117220611 Google Scholar

9. 

A. J. Walsh et al., “Action potential block in neurons by infrared light,” Neurophotonics, 3 (4), 040501 (2016). http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.NPh.3.4.040501 Google Scholar

10. 

A. R. Duke et al., “Spatial and temporal variability in response to hybrid electro-optical stimulation,” J. Neural Eng., 9 (3), 036003 (2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1741-2560/9/3/036003 Google Scholar

11. 

A. R. Duke et al., “Transient and selective suppression of neural activity with infrared light,” Sci. Rep., 3 2600 (2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep02600 Google Scholar

12. 

E. H. Lothet et al., “Alternating current and infrared produce an onset-free reversible nerve block,” Neurophotonics, 1 (1), 011010 (2014). http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.NPh.1.1.011010 Google Scholar

13. 

Y. T. Wang, A. M. Rollins and M. W. Jenkins, “Infrared inhibition of embryonic hearts,” J. Biomed. Opt., 21 (6), 060505 (2016). http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.21.6.060505 JBOPFO 1083-3668 Google Scholar

14. 

N. Kallweit et al., “Optoacoustic effect is responsible for laser-induced cochlear responses,” Sci. Rep., 6 28141 (2016). http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep28141 Google Scholar

15. 

R. U. Verma et al., “Auditory responses to electric and infrared neural stimulation of the rat cochlear nucleus,” Hear. Res., 310 69 –75 (2014). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2014.01.008 Google Scholar

16. 

A. C. Thompson et al., “Infrared neural stimulation fails to evoke neural activity in the deaf guinea pig cochlea,” Hear. Res., 324 46 –53 (2015). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2015.03.005 Google Scholar

17. 

I. U. Teudt et al., “Acoustic events and ‘optophonic’ cochlear responses induced by pulsed near-infrared laser,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 58 (6), 1648 –1655 (2011). http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2011.2108297 Google Scholar

18. 

J. Wells et al., “Biophysical mechanisms of transient optical stimulation of peripheral nerve,” Biophys. J., 93 (7), 2567 –2580 (2007). http://dx.doi.org/10.1529/biophysj.107.104786 Google Scholar

19. 

Q. Liu et al., “Exciting cell membranes with a blustering heat shock,” Biophys. J., 106 (8), 1570 –1577 (2014). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2014.03.008 Google Scholar

20. 

E. S. Albert et al., “TRPV4 channels mediate the infrared laser-evoked response in sensory neurons,” J. Neurophysiol., 107 (12), 3227 –3234 (2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.00424.2011 Google Scholar

21. 

H. T. Beier et al., “Plasma membrane nanoporation as a possible mechanism behind infrared excitation of cells,” J. Neural Eng., 11 (6), 066006 (2014). http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1741-2560/11/6/066006 Google Scholar

22. 

M. G. Shapiro et al., “Infrared light excites cells by changing their electrical capacitance,” Nat. Commun., 3 736 (2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1742 NCAOBW 2041-1723 Google Scholar

23. 

M. G. Shapiro et al., “Thermal mechanisms of millimeter wave stimulation of excitable cells,” Biophys. J., 104 (12), 2622 –2628 (2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2013.05.014 Google Scholar

24. 

V. Tseeb et al., “Highly thermosensitive Ca dynamics in a HeLa cell through IP(3) receptors,” HFSP J., 3 (2), 117 –123 (2009). http://dx.doi.org/10.2976/1.3073779 HJFOA5 1955-2068 Google Scholar

25. 

G. M. Dittami et al., “Intracellular calcium transients evoked by pulsed infrared radiation in neonatal cardiomyocytes,” J. Physiol., 589 (Pt. 6), 1295 –1306 (2011). http://dx.doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2010.198804 Google Scholar

26. 

V. Lumbreras et al., “Pulsed infrared radiation excites cultured neonatal spiral and vestibular ganglion neurons by modulating mitochondrial calcium cycling,” J. Neurophysiol., 112 (6), 1246 –1255 (2014). http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.00253.2014 Google Scholar

27. 

K. Oyama et al., “Microscopic heat pulses induce contraction of cardiomyocytes without calcium transients,” Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 417 (1), 607 –612 (2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.12.015 Google Scholar

28. 

S. A. Shintani et al., “High-frequency sarcomeric auto-oscillations induced by heating in living neonatal cardiomyocytes of the rat,” Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 457 (2), 165 –170 (2015). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.12.077 Google Scholar

29. 

L. F. Horowitz et al., “Phospholipase C in living cells activation, inhibition, Ca2+ requirement, and regulation of M current,” J. Gen. Physiol., 126 (3), 243 –262 (2005). http://dx.doi.org/10.1085/jgp.200509309 JGPLAD 0022-1295 Google Scholar

30. 

N. Gamper and M. S. Shapiro, “Regulation of ion transport proteins by membrane phosphoinositides,” Nat. Rev. Neurosci., 8 (12), 921 –934 (2007). http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrn2257 Google Scholar

31. 

N. Gamper and M. S. Shapiro, “Target-specific PIP(2) signalling: how might it work?,” J. Physiol., 582 (Pt. 3), 967 –975 (2007). http://dx.doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2007.132787 Google Scholar

32. 

S. Mandadi, P. J. Armati and B. D. Roufogalis, “Protein kinase C modulation of thermo-sensitive transient receptor potential channels: implications for pain signaling,” J. Natl. Sci. Biol. Med., 2 (1), 13 –25 (2011). http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-9668.82311 Google Scholar

33. 

S. Mandadi et al., “Activation of protein kinase C reverses capsaicin-induced calcium-dependent desensitization of TRPV1 ion channels,” Cell Calcium, 35 (5), 471 –478 (2004). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ceca.2003.11.003 CECADV 0143-4160 Google Scholar

34. 

I. Jardin et al., “Phosphatidylinositol 4, 5-bisphosphate enhances store-operated calcium entry through hTRPC6 channel in human platelets,” Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1783 (1), 84 –97 (2008). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2007.07.007 Google Scholar

35. 

Jr. J. W. Putney, “Inositol lipids and TRPC channel activation,” Biochem. Soc. Symp., 74 37 –45 (2007). http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/BSS2007c04 Google Scholar

36. 

M. Trebak et al., “Phospholipase C-coupled receptors and activation of TRPC channels,” Handb. Exp. Pharmacol., 179 593 –614 (2007). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-34891-7 Google Scholar

37. 

G. Vazquez et al., “The mammalian TRPC cation channels,” Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1742 (1–3), 21 –36 (2004). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2004.08.015 Google Scholar

38. 

P. Gottlieb et al., “Revisiting TRPC1 and TRPC6 mechanosensitivity,” Pflugers Arch., 455 (6), 1097 –1103 (2008). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00424-007-0359-3 Google Scholar

39. 

R. Maroto et al., “TRPC1 forms the stretch-activated cation channel in vertebrate cells,” Nat. Cell Biol., 7 (2), 179 –185 (2005). http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb1218 Google Scholar

40. 

G. M. Salido, S. O. Sage and J. A. Rosado, “TRPC channels and store-operated Ca2+ entry,” Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1793 (2), 223 –230 (2009). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2008.11.001 Google Scholar

41. 

N. Gamper, J. D. Stockand and M. S. Shapiro, “The use of Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells in the study of ion channels,” J. Pharmacol. Toxicol. Methods, 51 (3), 177 –185 (2005). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vascn.2004.08.008 Google Scholar

42. 

J. Liu et al., “Voltage-gated sodium channel expression and action potential generation in differentiated NG108-15 cells,” BMC Neurosci., 13 129 (2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-13-129 1471-2202 Google Scholar

43. 

C. C. Roth et al., “Nanosecond pulsed electric field thresholds for nanopore formation in neural cells,” J. Biomed. Opt., 18 (3), 035005 (2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.18.3.035005 JBOPFO 1083-3668 Google Scholar

44. 

G. Grynkiewicz, M. Poenie and R. Y. Tsien, “A new generation of Ca2+ indicators with greatly improved fluorescence properties,” J. Biol. Chem., 260 (6), 3440 –3450 (1985). Google Scholar

45. 

H. T. Beier et al., “Plasma membrane nanoporation as a possible mechanism behind infrared excitation of cells,” J. Neural Eng., 11 (6), 066006 (2014). http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1741-2560/11/6/066006 1741-2560 Google Scholar

46. 

C. A. Olsovsky et al., “Origins of intracellular calcium mobilization evoked by infrared laser stimulation,” Proc. SPIE, 9321 93210L (2015). http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.2079895 PSISDG 0277-786X Google Scholar

47. 

D. L. Bennett et al., “Expression and function of ryanodine receptors in nonexcitable cells,” J. Biol. Chem., 271 (11), 6356 –6362 (1996). http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.271.11.6356 Google Scholar

48. 

G. Inesi et al., “Cell-specific promoter in adenovirus vector for transgenic expression of SERCA1 ATPase in cardiac myocytes,” Am. J. Physiol., 274 (Pt. 3), C645 –C653 (1998). Google Scholar

49. 

M. S. Kirby et al., “Thapsigargin inhibits contraction and Ca2+ transient in cardiac cells by specific inhibition of the sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ pump,” J. Biol. Chem., 267 (18), 12545 –12551 (1992). Google Scholar

50. 

T. B. Rogers et al., “Use of thapsigargin to study Ca2+ homeostasis in cardiac cells,” Biosci. Rep., 15 (5), 341 –349 (1995). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01788366 Google Scholar

51. 

L. Chen, D. S. Koh and B. Hille, “Dynamics of calcium clearance in mouse pancreatic beta-cells,” Diabetes, 52 (7), 1723 –1731 (2003). http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/diabetes.52.7.1723 DIAEAZ 0012-1797 Google Scholar

52. 

R. ChakrabartiR. Chakrabarti, “Calcium signaling in non-excitable cells: Ca2+ release and influx are independent events linked to two plasma membrane Ca2+ entry channels,” J. Cell Biochem., 99 (6), 1503 –1516 (2006). http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1097-4644 Google Scholar

53. 

J. Tong, T. V. McCarthy and D. H. MacLennan, “Measurement of resting cytosolic Ca2+ concentrations and Ca2+ store size in HEK-293 cells transfected with malignant hyperthermia or central core disease mutant Ca2+ release channels,” J. Biol. Chem., 274 (2), 693 –702 (1999). http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.274.2.693 Google Scholar

54. 

J. L. Nunez and M. M. McCarthy, “Resting intracellular calcium concentration, depolarizing gamma-aminobutyric acid and possible role of local estradiol synthesis in the developing male and female hippocampus,” Neuroscience, 158 (2), 623 –634 (2009). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.09.061 Google Scholar

55. 

T. Maruyama et al., “2APB, 2-aminoethoxydiphenyl borate, a membrane-penetrable modulator of Ins(1, 4, 5)P3-induced Ca2+ release,” J. Biochem., 122 (3), 498 –505 (1997). http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a021780 Google Scholar

56. 

I. Ricard et al., “A caffeine/ryanodine-sensitive Ca2+ pool is involved in triggering spontaneous variations of Ca2+ in Jurkat T lymphocytes by a Ca(2+)-induced Ca2+ release (CICR) mechanism,” Cell Signal, 9 (2), 197 –206 (1997). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0898-6568(96)00141-6 Google Scholar

57. 

Q. Zhang et al., “R-type Ca(2+)-channel-evoked CICR regulates glucose-induced somatostatin secretion,” Nat. Cell Biol., 9 (4), 453 –460 (2007). http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb1563 Google Scholar

58. 

J. Gafni et al., “Xestospongins: potent membrane permeable blockers of the inositol 1, 4, 5-trisphosphate receptor,” Neuron, 19 (3), 723 –733 (1997). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80384-0 NERNET 0896-6273 Google Scholar

59. 

L. Lemonnier, M. Trebak and Jr J. W. Putney, “Complex regulation of the TRPC3, 6 and 7 channel subfamily by diacylglycerol and phosphatidylinositol-4, 5-bisphosphate,” Cell Calcium, 43 (5), 506 –514 (2008). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ceca.2007.09.001 CECADV 0143-4160 Google Scholar

60. 

S. Miehe et al., “Inhibition of diacylglycerol-sensitive TRPC channels by synthetic and natural steroids,” PLoS One, 7 (4), e35393 (2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035393 POLNCL 1932-6203 Google Scholar

61. 

A. M. Vites and A. J. Pappano, “Distinct modes of inhibition by ruthenium red and ryanodine of calcium-induced calcium release in avian atrium,” J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., 268 (3), 1476 –1484 (1994). Google Scholar

62. 

S. Dadsetan et al., “Store-operated Ca2+ influx causes Ca2+ release from the intracellular Ca2+ channels that is required for T cell activation,” J. Biol. Chem., 283 (18), 12512 –12519 (2008). http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M709330200 Google Scholar

63. 

P. Ronde, J. J. Dougherty and R. A. Nichols, “Functional IP3- and ryanodine-sensitive calcium stores in presynaptic varicosities of NG108-15 (rodent neuroblastoma x glioma hybrid) cells,” J. Physiol., 529 (Pt. 2), 307 –319 (2000). http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tjp.2000.529.issue-2 Google Scholar

64. 

Y. Murata et al., “Phosphoinositide phosphatase activity coupled to an intrinsic voltage sensor,” Nature, 435 (7046), 1239 –1243 (2005). http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature03650 Google Scholar

65. 

Y. Murata and Y. Okamura, “Depolarization activates the phosphoinositide phosphatase Ci-VSP, as detected in Xenopus oocytes coexpressing sensors of PIP2,” J. Physiol., 583 (Pt. 3), 875 –889 (2007). http://dx.doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2007.134775 Google Scholar

66. 

S. B. Hansen, “Lipid agonism: the PIP2 paradigm of ligand-gated ion channels,” Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids, 1851 (5), 620 –628 (2015). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbalip.2015.01.011 Google Scholar

67. 

M. J. Berridge, “Inositol trisphosphate and calcium signalling,” Nature, 361 (6410), 315 –325 (1993). http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/361315a0 Google Scholar

68. 

M. J. Berridge, “Inositol trisphosphate and calcium signalling mechanisms,” Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids, 1793 (6), 933 –940 (2009). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2008.10.005 Google Scholar

69. 

M. J. Berridge, P. Lipp and M. D. Bootman, “The versatility and universality of calcium signalling,” Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 1 (1), 11 –21 (2000). http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35036035 Google Scholar

70. 

E. A. Finch and G. J. Augustine, “Local calcium signalling by inositol-1, 4, 5-trisphosphate in Purkinje cell dendrites,” Nature, 396 (6713), 753 –756 (1998). http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/25541 Google Scholar

71. 

E. Oancea and T. Meyer, “Protein kinase C as a molecular machine for decoding calcium and diacylglycerol signals,” Cell, 95 (3), 307 –318 (1998). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81763-8 CELLB5 0092-8674 Google Scholar

72. 

E. Oancea et al., “Green fluorescent protein (GFP)-tagged cysteine-rich domains from protein kinase C as fluorescent indicators for diacylglycerol signaling in living cells,” J. Cell Biol., 140 (3), 485 –498 (1998). http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.140.3.485 Google Scholar

73. 

D. C. Immke and N. R. Gavva, “The TRPV1 receptor and nociception,” Semin. Cell Dev. Biol., 17 (5), 582 –591 (2006). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2006.09.004 SCDBFX 1084-9521 Google Scholar

74. 

G. P. Tolstykh et al., “600 ns pulse electric field-induced phosphatidylinositol-bisphosphate depletion,” Bioelectrochemistry, 100 80 –87 (2014). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bioelechem.2014.01.006 BEBEBP 0302-4598 Google Scholar

75. 

M. Seth et al., “Sarco(endo)plasmic reticulum Ca2+ ATPase (SERCA) gene silencing and remodeling of the Ca2+ signaling mechanism in cardiac myocytes,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 101 (47), 16683 –16688 (2004). http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0407537101 Google Scholar

76. 

F. Di Leva et al., “The plasma membrane Ca2+ ATPase of animal cells: structure, function and regulation,” Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 476 (1), 65 –74 (2008). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.abb.2008.02.026 Google Scholar

77. 

S. A. Locknar et al., “Calcium-induced calcium release regulates action potential generation in guinea-pig sympathetic neurones,” J. Physiol., 555 (Pt. 3), 627 –635 (2004). http://dx.doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2003.059485 Google Scholar

78. 

J. G. Barbara, “IP3-dependent calcium-induced calcium release mediates bidirectional calcium waves in neurones: functional implications for synaptic plasticity,” Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1600 (1–2), 12 –18 (2002). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1570-9639(02)00439-9 Google Scholar

79. 

A. Verkhratsky and A. Shmigol, “Calcium-induced calcium release in neurones,” Cell Calcium, 19 (1), 1 –14 (1996). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0143-4160(96)90009-3 CECADV 0143-4160 Google Scholar

80. 

N. Gamper and M. S. Shapiro, “Calmodulin mediates Ca2+-dependent modulation of M-type K+ channels,” J. Gen. Physiol., 122 (1), 17 –31 (2003). http://dx.doi.org/10.1085/jgp.200208783 Google Scholar

81. 

L. Antkiewicz-Michaluk, “Receptor and voltage-operated ion channels in the central nervous system,” J. Pharm. Pharmacol., 47 (3), 253 –264 (1995). http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jphp.1995.47.issue-3 Google Scholar

82. 

A. Sanchez-Perez et al., “Modulation of NMDA receptors in the cerebellum. II. Signaling pathways and physiological modulators regulating NMDA receptor function,” Cerebellum, 4 (3), 162 –170 (2005). http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14734220510008003 Google Scholar

83. 

R. Schneggenburger, F. Tempia and A. Konnerth, “Glutamate- and AMPA-mediated calcium influx through glutamate receptor channels in medial septal neurons,” Neuropharmacology, 32 (11), 1221 –1228 (1993). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0028-3908(93)90016-V NEPHBW 0028-3908 Google Scholar

84. 

D. M. Simeone, B. C. Kimball and M. W. Mulholland, “Acetylcholine-induced calcium signaling associated with muscarinic receptor activation in cultured myenteric neurons,” J. Am. Coll. Surg., 182 (6), 473 –481 (1996). Google Scholar

Biography

Gleb P. Tolstykh received the Presidential Research Fellowship award in 1995 and completed it at the University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio (USA). He continued his research career there, focusing on physiology and neuroscience. He was a Senior National Research Council Fellow (USA) from 2011 to 2013 at the Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL). Currently, he is a principal scientist at General Dynamics Information Technology, investigating high-energy-induced effects on cellular homeostasis.

Cory A. Olsovsky is a graduate student in the Biomedical Engineering Department at Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas. He received his BS degree in biomedical engineering from Texas A&M University in 2011. His current research is focused on innovative techniques for confocal microscopy.

Bennett L. Ibey received his PhD in biomedical engineering from Texas A&M University in biomedical optics in 2006. He joined AFRL’s Radio Frequency Bioeffects Branch in 2007 and serves as a principal investigator for high peak power microwave bioeffects and nanosecond electric pulse research. He is an associate editor for the Bioelectromagnetics Journal and a lifetime member of SPIE.

Hope T. Beier has been a research biomedical engineer in AFRL’s Optical Radiation Bioeffects Branch since November 2012. She serves as a principal investigator for efforts using advanced optical techniques to investigate the effects of directed energy (laser and radio frequency) on biology. She received her PhD in biomedical engineering from Texas A&M University in 2009. She joined AFRL in 2010 as a National Research Council Postdoctoral Research Associate.

© 2017 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) 2329-423X/2017/$25.00 © 2017 SPIE
Gleb P. Tolstykh, Cory A. Olsovsky, Bennett L. Ibey, and Hope T. Beier "Ryanodine and IP3 receptor-mediated calcium signaling play a pivotal role in neurological infrared laser modulation," Neurophotonics 4(2), 025001 (5 April 2017). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.NPh.4.2.025001
Received: 1 December 2016; Accepted: 20 March 2017; Published: 5 April 2017
Lens.org Logo
CITATIONS
Cited by 13 scholarly publications.
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Calcium

Receptors

Plasma

Infrared lasers

Modulation

Infrared radiation

Infrared imaging

Back to Top